Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:20:24 -0700 From: Dolgan <dolgan2k@home.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome compliance? Message-ID: <395A8837.1F934639@home.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, this problem got a whole lot weirder, but a whole lot brighter. I noticed that Netscape kept crashing whenever I went to a site (It still does - but there's always Mozilla and right now, I want GNOME working. One problem at a time, right?), so I installed Netscape 3 for experiment's sake. Suddenly, I restarted X, and sawfish was "gnome compliant" and Gnome was zippy. That makes me think that sawfish's compliancy is causing Gnome to be sluggish - somehow. Unfortunately, next time I restarted X it went back to crap. Does anyone know what could be related to SAWFISH that could be causing Gnome to not think it's wm-compliant? On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Dolgan wrote: ... : I installed clean from a 6-27-2000 snapshot. That was yesterday. Wouldn't : that make the ports updated, or not..? Hmm, it should yes. : Why would it be a ports thing, though? It's Gnome 1.2.1... latest. Is there : something weird with ports? : Latest sawfish too. Yeah, but ports often apply several patches to make things work right on FreeBSD, those patches could have been updated without a version upgrade of gnome. Given that you installed from a snapshot of yesterday, you should have the latest ports though. At this point, I'm not sure what the problem is.. Maybe someone who runs the combination would have an idea. * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * -- Dolgan icq@14444322 dolgan@linuxfan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?395A8837.1F934639>