Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:09:43 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: Jonathan Belson <jon@witchspace.com>, freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build error with cvs code Message-ID: <20030115010943.GA85387@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <hfiswrxqec.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> References: <200301101311.10596.jon@witchspace.com> <20030113174306.GA82141@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <hfiswrxqec.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Without knowing where you're at with that code, I'm not too sure. How is the new Hui design going anyways? Have you achieved similar functionality already? A. On Tue Jan 14, 2003 at 03:28:27PM -0800, Max Okumoto wrote: > > I have tried to fix it in the past but since I was working on a > replacement I haven't put much effort into fixing it. Would > anyone mind if I replace the code with what I am working on? > > Max Okumoto > > > > The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> writes: > > > On Fri Jan 10, 2003 at 01:11:10PM +0000, Jonathan Belson wrote: > > > Hiya > > > > > > > > > Just tried to build the current libh sources (from anon cvs) and I got the > > > following error: > > > > > > g++31 -pipe -g -I/usr/local/include/tcl8.3 -fpic -DPIC -I/usr/home/jon/projects/libh/lib/hui/../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DUSE_Qt -Wall -c /usr/home/jon/projects/libh/lib/hui/HuiQt.cc -o HuiQt.o > > > /usr/home/jon/projects/libh/include/Pointer.hh: In constructor > > > > ... > > > > > I'm building under -STABLE with gcc 3.1. Anyone else seen this error? > > > > Yes, I've been having this for a while now... > > > > > I can't figure out why it needs the operator* at this point since the variable 'dialog' matches > > > the return type (although I haven't studied the code in much detail yet - I'm probably > > > missing something important). > > > > Thanks for your notification. :) The problem here is that the > > Pointer.hh file haven't changed much since it's first inclusion in the > > CVS repo. On the other hand, HuiQt.hh changed a *lot*, so I suspect > > the problem is more likely to be there instead. > > > > In other words, I have no idea how this error got in. Maybe it's > > related with the GCC 3.x upgrade? > > > > Max, your opinion on this? > > > > A. > > -- > > Imagination is more important than knowledge > > - Albert Einstein > -- From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, from the age of Big Brother, from the age of doublethink - greetings! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+JLTWttcWHAnWiGcRAvrJAKCc+pssAZxOuidLaXDQo7hUGtCVNACgmAwS kARNp606QRst8b/9YfiIbV8= =3bNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115010943.GA85387>