Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:23:22 +0100 From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net> To: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <045801c3b2e1$f4844240$b9844051@insultant.net> References: <16322.26365.159173.946033@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So.. forking a dynamic sh is roughly 40% more expensive than > forking a static copy of sh. This is embarrassing. read the original paper carefully: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cache/papers/cs/3066/http:zSzzSzswt-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.dezSz~1friedrizSzsvzSzreferenceszSzShared_Libraries_In_Sun_OS.pdf/gingell87shared.pdf it's conclusions state that they are slower. this was the _original paper_ that announced the damn things.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?045801c3b2e1$f4844240$b9844051>