Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 18:40:41 +0000 From: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) To: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel? Message-ID: <E0xfr3p-0004d5-00@ash3.doc.ic.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net> "Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel?" (Dec 10, 10:09am)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 10, 10:09am, The Classiest Man Alive wrote: } Subject: Re: Why so many steps to build new kernel? > <RANT> > > transistor? Nobody's going to be any worse off if we *add* some new ways > to do things. I don't think anyone on this list has said that GUI tools shouldn't be *added*, just that they should be built on top of a command line util. > I sincerely think that some of you are actually opposed to > the proliferation of FreeBSD to people who don't think Emacs is the > greatest app ever written. stdin: parse error Yes, I agree vi > emacs if thats what you're trying to say. > I swear, you all are going to drive me to learn C. "anything but perl" Niall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0xfr3p-0004d5-00>