Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:30:37 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copyright Issues Message-ID: <41A4C53D.908@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <20041124072513.GN65445@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNMELCEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <41A431CA.2040506@theatre.msu.edu> <20041124072513.GN65445@iconoplex.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Robinson wrote: >On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:01:30AM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > > > >>and on that note, did they continue that copyright infringment on the >>actual product? Cause my spidey sense is sensing that machine being sold >>out soon. (come on, you're all thinking how much you want a daemon >>packaged condom on your workstation. admit it.) >> >> > >I've heard it called many, many things before but I think that's the >first time I've heard somebody refer to it as a "workstation". Your >partner is either very geeky, or very tolerant... > >Why do I get the feeling that we're now going to be bombarded with slang >terms, pet names (we really, really, really don't want to do pet names >by the way - I have no interest in knowing what various committers call >their genitals), double and single entendres and this is all going to >get very homoerotic and slightly uncomfortable to watch? > > ROFLMBU...as if geeks needed a whole new class of acronyms! Suppose we can get some added to the "Jargon File"?? KDK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41A4C53D.908>