Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:00:58 +0300 From: "Huzeyfe Onal" <huzeyfe.onal@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_AVELINE?=" <saveline@alinto.net> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf and policy routing Message-ID: <ffa9ac690606220900o3165855cu169e2304ee7993e4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <449ABD0B.2040706@alinto.net> References: <449ABD0B.2040706@alinto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, you can use PF's route-to options for Policy routing.. On 6/22/06, S=E9bastien AVELINE <saveline@alinto.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to have some advises on pf. I'd like to use pf for > clustering a firewall and using pfsync. > Actually I use a Linux Box to do this. The problem is that I have > specific rules for routing with iproute2 because I got a lot of > different subnets with multi-homing. It seems that freebsd support > policy routing only with ipfw. > My question is : is it possible to use ipfw just for policy routing and > pf just for packet filtering ? > For example I want to to do something like that : > > I had a default gateway (a) but if I received a packet from subnet(c) to > subnet(d) --> use an another default gateway(y) > a > packet from subnet(a) to subnet(x) --> use an another default gateway(y) > > > I wonder if route-to of pf is good for my exemple or if I should try > something else like ipfw for routing and pf for firewalling as I said > above. Actually I'm using freebsd 6.1 for some tests. > > Thanx for your answers. > > > Sebastien AVELINE > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Huzeyfe =D6NAL +90 505 5260064 --- Ag Guvenligi Listesine uye oldunuz mu? http://www.huzeyfe.net/netsec.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ffa9ac690606220900o3165855cu169e2304ee7993e4>