Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:07:12 -0000 From: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340905 - in stable/12: release/pkg_repos usr.sbin/pkg Message-ID: <20190419130522.GI39941@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <0100016a32795508-fd8bbc41-2b38-40ae-903a-e3ef3739dfd8-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <201811241747.wAOHlr6W029937@repo.freebsd.org> <0100016a32795508-fd8bbc41-2b38-40ae-903a-e3ef3739dfd8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:02:53PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > On 11/24/18 9:47 AM, Glen Barber wrote: > > Author: gjb > > Date: Sat Nov 24 17:47:53 2018 > > New Revision: 340905 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/340905 > >=20 > > Log: > > Revert r340161 in stable/12, setting the default pkg(8) repository ba= ck > > to 'latest' from 'quarterly' prior to branching releng/12.0. > It looks like this is incorrect for non-x86 architectures. Portmgr may > correct me here, but it looks like "latest" builds are only done on non-x= 86 > architectures on HEAD. (The same problem also applies on stable/11.) >=20 > I'm guessing that the answer here is to have different package configurat= ions > installed depending on the architecture; I knew how to do this with the o= ld > style of src/etc but I'm not sure how to do it now that pkgbase has spread > configuration files all over the tree. >=20 For 13.0-CURRENT, both latest and quarterly are updated. For non-x86 on 12.0-STABLE and 11.2-STABLE, quarterly is updated (not latest), so from a general sense of this particular commit, it is correct. But you are also correct in your assertion that the current default (latest) for non-x86 does appear to be incorrect. I'll do some poking around into this. Thank you for bringing this up. Glen --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAly5x4YACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pN8IA//d/nKqUlI+8b+Mb7Dbb7Vyf3tNwEdsU6IIE1btByJpDyBJklaBXtXtpNK em9v0t5H8T+i87ZGUzIbieg6LpZyT3PElJhnT2q0tpV6fb9JzdAvgDF7dzw8hmjS sURwaX7eeFUqAhi5fiwBa/9JW2YUMxVOKNyIM/YFVmOwChcWENDr01TtT6J/z9gb yxOlSUPkiB1Mi8dIMQJ0ulryjcSN4126o64cCxDSFM9WTPLTtTuzHHEkartPAolk TFRG7rcvvv0xxoEEh+ptyo0Vi5YMD1SF3M0jQiLkXrnrwLdc2RxTiz/hySodlYLn MMX24J6mor4qC4Ir7aXjH8G50Nmj6cVyNXVG1/IqeSPiEN12n6bQCkFgzQ4w7uc1 3UB/qKh1aoeYfBWyb4aLCCRum3dMZg0IZrWeKA4Y70qClt6xsBYB/NjpI+I/7oWQ GW8ol38Uz3JEsXn+KlVxVD+e4k0dJ/PwHzx6zknMAiFkNpykUYAhdulDVKnr1+xI lSJmbHWsqLHXAimuoZ2/2bFoJKzuOVeecEe8IU5rF9+YWUV7Gc6w0behpdMgXCdF o+aaUOgQIn7mZnSymndagfp/PifQ61rTjZW5uW2yqdp+CZc/X5WJHJamE2J6bBlr 4/qOBy34BCPKGanUprVagNtkHgHkJxFRO0inK34KbRmQRNELvuY= =7gV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pgaa2uWPnPrfixyx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190419130522.GI39941>