Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:46:20 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@bayofrum.net> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mount(1) without /etc/fstab Message-ID: <2CACBF9B-AA7F-456B-AC39-038812DA016E@bayofrum.net> In-Reply-To: <51EFA71B.1070601@FreeBSD.org> References: <51EFA71B.1070601@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Jul 2013, at 11:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > I found behavior of mount(1) rather annoying when there is no /etc/fstab. > Some systems legitimately do not need (anything in) /etc/fstab, so all of= that > complaining is in vain. >=20 > Should mount(1) be silenced in this case? > Or should we have and install an empty etc/fstab just to please mount(1)? I think mount should be silenced. This is a problem that has come up in a = couple of ports that complain-- the package building jails don't have fstab= s, and we have to work around that. Chris --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2CACBF9B-AA7F-456B-AC39-038812DA016E>