Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:49:48 +0200 From: Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: alc@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/busdma index.sgml Message-ID: <1156160988.670.8.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060821113456.GC66496@elvis.mu.org> References: <200608211124.k7LBOC1e076436@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060821113456.GC66496@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:34 +0200, Maxime Henrion wrote: > Joel Dahl wrote: > > joel 2006-08-21 11:24:11 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en/projects/busdma index.sgml > > Log: > > Add bce, bfe, ixgb, mxgb, nfe, stge and vge. Mark everything as > > unknown for now. > > I took a look at the ixgb(4) driver some time ago and fixed some > brokenness that I could spot WRT busdma. As far as I can (could) > tell, ixgb(4) should be correctly busdma-ified now, but unfortunately > I couldn't ever test this. These NICs are very rare, and the few > people who are using those that I could find were using them on > x86. Ok. I'm no expert, but it looks like ixgb is locked and has INTR_MPSAFE enabled (alc did some work on this, see rev 1.7 of ixgb.c). Should I mark busdma, INTR_MPSAFE and SMPng locked as done? -- Joel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1156160988.670.8.camel>