Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 19:39:08 +0100 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current Message-ID: <20140522193908.04737bec@bender.Home> In-Reply-To: <5D4F0BD5-89DA-421F-B095-A5F2C49F3DF9@bsdimp.com> References: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com> <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <95AD97BA-AA48-4BBF-845C-D0CB585ACAA3@bsdimp.com> <20140522090504.GA22488@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <5D4F0BD5-89DA-421F-B095-A5F2C49F3DF9@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 May 2014 08:07:34 -0600 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > On May 22, 2014, at 3:05 AM, John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:01:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >> On May 21, 2014, at 1:28 PM, John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>>> isn't eabi on the xscale still broken? > >>> > >>> It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than > >>> that. :-( By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get > >>> an AVILA kernel built that boots with src from head at around mid > >>> December. Latest 10 and head just give no output, with or without > >>> WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined. > >> > >> Does the same thing happen with make.conf instead of src.conf? > > > > Yes, I have tried both 10 and head with WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes and no > > output after go in redboot. My compile lines look like this: > > > > make TARGET_ARCH=armeb TARGET_CPUTYPE=xscale toolchain > > make TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=armeb buildkernel KERNCONF=AVILA > > DESTDIR=/arm/ > > > > And then in redboot "load -b 0x200000 kernel" to load it with tftp. > > And then "go". > > > > The "no output" happened somewhere between mid December and > > beginning of Feb. I determined that before getting side tracked. > > I'll see in the next day or two if I can narrow that down. > > > > If someone have patches so that WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes is not needed > > anymore, I'll test that too. > > This is with gcc, not clang, right? Clang doesn't support armeb. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140522193908.04737bec>