Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:36:14 +0200 From: Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top(1) displaying threads Message-ID: <200511302136.15450.nike_d@cytexbg.com> In-Reply-To: <200511301318.16731.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200511301855.20346.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <200511301318.16731.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 20:18, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:55 am, Niki Denev wrote: > > Hello, > > > > From some time in 6.0 and -current top(1) shows by default also the > > kernel threads. > > But the top(1) manual page still says that the default behaviour is NOT > > to show them. > > > > Maybe something like this will be enough: > > > > --- usr.bin/top/top.local.1 Fri Jul 18 02:56:39 2003 > > +++ usr.bin/top/top.local.1.fix Wed Nov 30 18:51:35 2005 > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > > > > .SH DISPLAY OF THREADS > > The '-H' option will toggle the display of kernel visible thread > > contexts. -At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is > > OFF. +At runtime the 'H' key will toggle this mode. The default is ON. > > > > .SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY > > Mem: 9220K Active, 1032K Inact, 3284K Wired, 1MB Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K > > Free > > The manpage is correct. The problem is that kernel threads such as > ithreads are really kernel processes currently. Oh, i see. I was confused by the "THR" column, but now everything is clear :) Thanks and sorry for the noise. --niki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511302136.15450.nike_d>