Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:22:20 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Matthew Fleming <mdf@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: -ffunction-sections, -fdata-sections and -Wl,--gc-sections Message-ID: <1379460140.1197.59.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonnuskWb%2Bk7JtpgAfB6PV3FD6YCgreioJcfhBpCJm6naA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJOYFBBGY0GosPwG1B=1MKyapChEtX-O97r2zhXpGS8o7WO3gA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMBSHm_Qk13P=j1VOzuibYaeHFVF%2BCuXbTYL=q8ToDP6wL5X5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJOYFBBUT5v1E6L0JkdrAXFmJmR0W2tmyNrC71k8mahLiF5vWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonnuskWb%2Bk7JtpgAfB6PV3FD6YCgreioJcfhBpCJm6naA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:56 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ... I'd rather see if we can actually separate out things some more so > these builds can shrink. > > Eg, if there's malloc related functions that aren't used, maybe we should > break malloc down into a directory full of functions. > Why is that better than using this automated solution? -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1379460140.1197.59.camel>