Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:20:27 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: missing pam(8) man page?
Message-ID:  <86lkutu37o.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20060329011924.GA1280@anathema.b1tt3r.org> (Sam Stein's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:19:24 -0600")
References:  <20060329011924.GA1280@anathema.b1tt3r.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Sam Stein <scs@b1tt3r.org> writes:
> In various manpages, su and pam_unix for example, reference the manpage
> pam(8) but there is no pam(8) there is a pam(3)... this sys was JUST upgraded
> hours ago, and I have asked other people... and they all have the same
> problem... so either its missing, or its a false reference.

Both, in the sense that there should be one, but it was never written.
Most of the information it should contain is present in pam(3) and
pam.conf(5).

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86lkutu37o.fsf>