Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:50:48 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 240115] fsdb man page does not mention ZFS, and probably wrong about btime being UFS2 only
Message-ID:  <bug-240115-227-Z9GT1PmrTn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-240115-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-240115-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240115

--- Comment #2 from Sean McBride <sean@rogue-research.com> ---
Thanks for your fast response.

I am pretty new to FreeBSD, so of course what seems obvious to you is perha=
ps
unclear to newbies. :)

The name 'fsdb' suggested 'file system debug', I didn't expect it to apply =
to
only one filesystem.

>NAME
>     fsdb =E2=80=93 FFS debugging/editing tool

You know, I think I only saw one 'F' :), like:  'FS debugging/editing tool'

>The point of comparison is UFS1.  ZFS is out of scope of the page.

Which was not obvious to me before now.

------

Perhaps some wording could be improved nevertheless.  ex, that very first l=
ine
could be:

NAME
     fsdb =E2=80=93 FFS/UFS debugging/editing tool

"FFS" seems to be a lesser known acronym, ex: Wikipedia's disambiguation pa=
ge
lists "Flash File System" and "Formatted File System" but only "Berkeley Fa=
st
File System".

Even a short sentence to say that the tool supports no other file system wo=
uld
be nice IMHO.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240115-227-Z9GT1PmrTn>