Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:50:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240115] fsdb man page does not mention ZFS, and probably wrong about btime being UFS2 only Message-ID: <bug-240115-227-Z9GT1PmrTn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-240115-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-240115-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240115 --- Comment #2 from Sean McBride <sean@rogue-research.com> --- Thanks for your fast response. I am pretty new to FreeBSD, so of course what seems obvious to you is perhaps unclear to newbies. :) The name 'fsdb' suggested 'file system debug', I didn't expect it to apply to only one filesystem. >NAME > fsdb – FFS debugging/editing tool You know, I think I only saw one 'F' :), like: 'FS debugging/editing tool' >The point of comparison is UFS1. ZFS is out of scope of the page. Which was not obvious to me before now. ------ Perhaps some wording could be improved nevertheless. ex, that very first line could be: NAME fsdb – FFS/UFS debugging/editing tool "FFS" seems to be a lesser known acronym, ex: Wikipedia's disambiguation page lists "Flash File System" and "Formatted File System" but only "Berkeley Fast File System". Even a short sentence to say that the tool supports no other file system would be nice IMHO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240115-227-Z9GT1PmrTn>