Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 12:26:48 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: Simon Marlow <simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk>, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, jhs@freebsd.org, sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VM/kernel problems? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960915122059.12726A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199609141728.KAA04566@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 14 Sep 1996, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > I really doubt that this cache coloring is going to have much effect on > machines without external cache, infact now that I think about it a little > it should not matter what address patern is giving to external memory, it > just won't effect performance. It's not what address pattern it gives, but how it distributes the hot addresses over the cache. The overhead should be negligible. Regards, Mike Hancockhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960915122059.12726A-100000>