Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 12:26:48 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: Simon Marlow <simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk>, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, jhs@freebsd.org, sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VM/kernel problems? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960915122059.12726A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199609141728.KAA04566@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 14 Sep 1996, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > I really doubt that this cache coloring is going to have much effect on > machines without external cache, infact now that I think about it a little > it should not matter what address patern is giving to external memory, it > just won't effect performance. It's not what address pattern it gives, but how it distributes the hot addresses over the cache. The overhead should be negligible. Regards, Mike Hancockhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960915122059.12726A-100000>