Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 08:55:38 -0300 From: Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> To: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> Cc: Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org> <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 01:31:07PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:44:51 -0300 > Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:53AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > > > araujo 2009-06-30 14:28:41 UTC > > > >=20 > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > >=20 > > > > Modified files: > > > > archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo=20 > > > > Log: > > > > - Update to 1.7. > > > > =20 > > > > PR: based on ports/136003 > > > > Submitted by: Sylvio Cesar <scjamorim@bsd.com.br> (maintainer) > > > > Approved by: maintainer > > >=20 > > > Why would maintainer need to explicitly approve their changes? > >=20 > > Hi danfe, > >=20 > > It is very easy to answer, because he knows better than me if the new > > version is usable or not. The maintainer submitted an update to 1.6, an= d as > > we have a new release, I feel that was better ask the maintainer about = that. > >=20 > > Generally the maintainer knows better than us what is good or not for y= our > > ports. Of course everybody knows that. > >=20 >=20 > When the maintainer submits an update to one of his ports then he > rather obviously has also automatically approved the changes. >=20 > I think that is what danfe was getting at. >=20 Hi Gery, I understood what danfe told. But in anyway, better safe than sorry, so that's it. Another thing, the version that was submitted by GNATS is different of the latest version. And as the maintainer knows the port better than me, and I didn't have any additional effort to send a mail to he, was a good thing to do. There is no problem with the port, and this dialog don't make any sense. Best Regards, --=20 Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The first 90 percent of the task takes 90 percent of the time, the last 10 percent takes the other 90 percent. --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKS066ovxJd1Pkz6gRAnEtAJ9bssaV4Ru+8ks3UR/YNFJDgbKEEQCfdlN2 poP3qCWheR8IQLVCuQAxhwA= =J02U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090701115538.GB1241>