Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:13:26 +0200
From:      Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To:        Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
Cc:        thomas@hentschel.net, steve@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Zope port revamp [was ports/18444: zope port outdated]
Message-ID:  <20000614131325.B25770@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20000614123022.A12825@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 12:30:23PM %2B0200
References:  <200005290250.TAA41586@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006132355.QAA19931@dorothy.hentschel.net> <20000614123022.A12825@mithrandr.moria.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 12:30:23PM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> On Tue 2000-06-13 (17:14), thomas@hentschel.net wrote:
> > 	In order to make all that easily install-able and accessible from
> > 	within FreeBSD, I thought of using the ports system. For that I
> > 	would have to create a separate zope section (/usr/ports/zope). 
> 
> You wouldn't have to.  Chances are it'd fit quite nicely in ports/www.
> If you really envisage 50 products, though, I'm sure it's possible get
> some leeway.  It would certainly be a virtual category.

Well, check out http://www.zope.org/Products, and note that there are over 140
'products' available (there is a link at the bottom to the next twenty
products, I missed it the first time ;)

As I'm not yet familiar with Zope, I wouldn't know how many of these
products would need to be ported or anything, but if there is interest
in these it would surely fill up ports/www...

Maybe a common prefix would help in the meantime, like the perl modules?
Something like ports/www/zope-[squishdot,wiki,...]?

> 
> > 	Is that something which sounds feasible ? If so, I'll submit a
> > 	patch for the upcoming Zope-2.2.0 release with that
> > 	functionality.
> 
> I'd be happy to commit the Zope updates, since I was about to start
> doing the same.  For now, it'd work fine in its current position,
> ports/www/zope, and maybe just zope Products need go in ports/zope, if
> one is created in the future.

I'd say if you create ports/zope, IMHO you should put the main distribution
there also.

--Stijn


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000614131325.B25770>