Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Jun 1998 03:32:09 +0400
From:      Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfs nfs_vnops.c 
Message-ID:  <199806042332.DAA03137@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Jun 1998 22:25:16 %2B0800." <199806041425.WAA24512@spinner.netplex.com.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think, NFS may and should pretend that chflags(..., 0) succeed. Nobody 
would notice any difference, anyway :-) msdosfs do so since 1994 (rev. 1.11 
of msdosfs_vnops.c). (It returns EINVAL rather than EOPNOTSUPP, though. 
I plan to change it.)

Dima





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806042332.DAA03137>