Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 20:58:04 +0000 From: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org> Cc: git@freebsd.org, mat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports 2020Q3 branch not present? Message-ID: <20200711205804.GA22050@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org> <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 21:24:16 +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I noticed that ports 2020Q3 branched is not present in the git ports tree > > at cgit-beta.freebsd.org > > > > It was branched from subversion HEAD as r541028 on 2020-07-02 12:04:18 UTC > > The other quarterly branches all seem to be present. > > Indeed, thanks for the report! I changed the location the branches are > being pushed to and messed this up, actually. > Oops :) > Now, the big question is whether we want these branches under refs/heads > so that everyone will pull them by default (rather wasteful?) or whether > we stick them someplace else, so people checking them out will need to > add a custom "fetch" line (like we do this for vendor branches over in > src). > > Thoughts? I'm strongly favoring the latter. > [adding mat@ who is the portmgr-git liaison IIRC] Hmm, so currently the quarterly (and older releng) branches are directly under the "remotes" origin, just like master itself. This makes switching between branches easy, which comes in handy for MFHs I think. Is there a way to see how much space each of the branches consume? Currently I have an idx of 141 MB and a pack of 763 MB, not much larger than a single branch in Subversion (.svn directory starting at 650 MB). Regards, René
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200711205804.GA22050>