Date: 22 Oct 2000 17:39:30 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ideas concerning fsck Message-ID: <xzp3dhox4ul.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group's message of "Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:18:02 -0700" References: <200010221518.e9MFIUX53822@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes: > Other than making the fsck process more windows-like by reducing the > control the admin would have over the fsck process and giving people > with little or no UNIX experience an easier time managing FreeBSD > systems, I fail to see the benefit of this change -- the additional > error checking excepted. If you think obviating the need for Pass# is a Bad Thing, how about making it optional (defaulting to 1) so you can still set it manually on your systems, and the rest of us won't have to? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3dhox4ul.fsf>