Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:23:59 -0500
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        David Christensen <davidch@broadcom.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Question about bce driver
Message-ID:  <E48C221E1F5DD6C5ACFC55F8@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <09BFF2FA5EAB4A45B6655E151BBDD9030477CD64@NT-IRVA-0750.brcm.ad.broadcom.com>
References:  <200707121608.l6CG8Sur002750@ambrisko.com> <469657BD.3010204@tomjudge.com> <09BFF2FA5EAB4A45B6655E151BBDD9030477CD0F@NT-IRVA-0750.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> <48951B1B7222BB1512D27F8D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <09BFF2FA5EAB4A45B6655E151BBDD9030477CD64@NT-IRVA-0750.brcm.ad.broadcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========3ECBE2EF37E2D349828C==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

--On Thursday, July 12, 2007 16:11:11 -0700 David Christensen=20
<davidch@broadcom.com> wrote:

>> Dave, perhaps you could answer my question?
>>
>> I'm using the 0.9.6 driver with 6.1 RELEASE.  I don't use
>> jumbo frames, so
>> the only problem I've experienced is the link state going up and down
>> occasionally.
>>
>> Does the more current driver solve the link state problem?
>> If it does, can
>> I use it on 6.1 merely by replacing the three files included
>> with it?  Or
>> are there includes that refer to other libraries that have
>> changed since
>> 6.1?
>>
>> Am I better off upgrading the entire system to 6.2?  (I
>> prefer not to do
>> this, because I have to take the site down to do so.
>> Patching files and
>> rebuilding world and kernel only takes the box out of service
>> during the
>> reboots.
>
> I've never seen the link up/down problem myself, so I don't know
> if any changes I've made have an effect on it.  You would need to
> change more than the bce driver since it depends upon the brgphy
> driver under sys/dev/mii which would also need to change.  There
> may be other dependencies upon changes in the 6.2 kernel which
> would prevent a quick/easy port without some debugging.
>
> Dave
>
Thanks for the quick answer.


--=20
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

--==========3ECBE2EF37E2D349828C==========--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E48C221E1F5DD6C5ACFC55F8>