Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:38:00 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Oliver Blasnik <oliver.blasnik@de.tiscali.com>
Cc:        Lanny Baron <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.com>, beemern <beemern@ksu.edu>, smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Intel SE7500CW2 narrowed down...
Message-ID:  <3DEE4B88.4781DFF1@mindspring.com>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.33L.0212040824270.9632-100000@unix2.cc.ksu.edu> <015301c29ba9$737e98d0$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> <001801c29bb5$f09a5ff0$0200a8c0@noemie> <01ed01c29bb9$d8027550$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Blasnik wrote:
> And, no, why should we buy (a) from the US and (b) from a "small" OEM?

To get working hardware?  8-) 8-).

> Working in a european-wide company has some side effects - for example
> a policy to buy only specific servers from specific vendors (which have=

> to be available in all that countrys). So, there are only the "Big
> Players", f.ex. HP, SUN, ...=B4
> =

> Back to track: this is no solution; buying hardware by OS needs and not=

> by system needs/policy/[insert-any-other-reason]. If the OS doesn't wor=
k
> with a standard hardware it's simply of no use. Don't get me wrong, I
> WANT to use FreeBSD - but this isn't my choice anymore if it does not r=
un
> on our typical hardware. I hate to use Linux and I definately hate to
> use Solaris (and even pay for that crap).

May I suggest that you buy MP Intel motherboards from the Intel
Server Products division of Intel, rather than from the division
of Intel that decided not to stair-step PCI IRQ's by slot, until
two years after everyone else did it so that everything would not
end up on "INT A"?

-- Terry



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DEE4B88.4781DFF1>