Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:01:15 +1000 From: freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux-threads Message-ID: <4F1AC52B.2070202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com> References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121140220.GA32638@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/22/12 00:02, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 06:57:27PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> By all means shout me down if you like, but I just received the >> updates re ports unmaintained etc and I noticed linux-threads is one >> of them. > The portsmon email is strictly mechanical. It's just going off the > fact that the maintainer for the port is ports@. > > fwiw. Yeah I'm aware of that. What I'm wondering is why it might not be maintained by emulation@ instead of ports?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F1AC52B.2070202>