Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 01:17:43 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Alphons van Werven <freebsd@skysmurf.nl> Cc: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category customports Message-ID: <56C65F27.5090802@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at> <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alphons van Werven wrote: > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > >> But this could be overwritten with the next update. >> > [snip] > >> But this could also [sic] overwritten. >> > > You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not > override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree > here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly > why I use SVN instead of portsnap. > > You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't > know about that. > > HTH, > > AvW > > You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to include local changes? -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56C65F27.5090802>