Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:22:53 +0100 From: James Raftery <james@kerna.ie> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:12.openssh [REVISED] Message-ID: <20030920172253.GA94049@bender.kerna.ie> In-Reply-To: <20030918145005.GB32994@madman.celabo.org> References: <200309172237.h8HMbuvK078935@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030918100907.GA85007@bender.kerna.ie> <20030918145005.GB32994@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > In this way we have three patches to distribute instead of 1 per > release. (Likewise, there is a single sendmail patch instead of 1 per > release.) I see; I hadn't considered that version.h would need a custom patch on each branch. Updated patch strings probably aren't worth the complication. > You can also pull down the ancilliary patches (version.h, newvers.sh, > UPDATING, etc) via other mechanisms (e.g. anon CVS, cvsweb) if you > like. Indeed - I have already done so. My scanssh output now looks a lot healthier :) Thanks, james
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030920172253.GA94049>