Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:03:07 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Thomas K." <fwd@gothschlampen.com> Subject: Re: Memstick image differences between 8.x and 9.x Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmomih6tz7JGJG8HCvNq_07gbeAs86AtjZK020mvJXJWVDg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E913502.5020307@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111008155252.GA24223.edited@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <CAGH67wTeHVfb01Bc51%2Bd=XCct7cUBfobcg5zWM-Rn%2B3bdM43cg@mail.gmail.com> <4E90B4B1.7000009@FreeBSD.org> <20111009024140.GA13517@vs2.gothschlampen.com> <4E913502.5020307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 October 2011 13:45, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Mostly what I was getting at here was ensuring the first blocks of the > memory stick did not contain "actual data." =A0Though, I fear other force= s > may be at play here with GPT... > There are. We've lost this round; let's just throw MBR back onto the memstick images and then focus these boot related issues to fixing the bootloader. :) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmomih6tz7JGJG8HCvNq_07gbeAs86AtjZK020mvJXJWVDg>