Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:17:25 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Tools/scripts README README.portsearch ports/Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl Message-ID: <CAGH67wSb_wLuHYZ6HYWzLpt79HVVAuBe7Rx8GPEdRuz-44%2B-PQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFFB%2BpRUL-D33--G%2Bs6Di0XiUSywt_DGNh9cTz5Spdb7-5gKQQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112270332.pBR3WPZc022687@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111227142755.GA62363@atarininja.org> <CAFFB%2BpRUL-D33--G%2Bs6Di0XiUSywt_DGNh9cTz5Spdb7-5gKQQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Wesley Shields <wxs@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:32:25AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> eadler 2011-12-27 03:32:25 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> . UPDATING >>> Tools/scripts README README.portsearch >>> Tools/scripts/modules buildmodules.pl >>> Log: >>> - Remove some old duplicate words. They were getting in way of finding newer ones. >>> >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.23 +2 -2 ports/Tools/scripts/README >>> http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/Tools/scripts/README.diff?r1=1.22&r2=1.23 >>> | --- ports/Tools/scripts/README 2010/01/29 14:52:45 1.22 >>> | +++ ports/Tools/scripts/README 2011/12/27 03:32:25 1.23 >>> | @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >>> | -$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.22 2010/01/29 14:52:45 kuriyama Exp $ >>> | +$FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/Tools/scripts/README,v 1.23 2011/12/27 03:32:25 eadler Exp $ >>> | >>> | ardiff - compare two archives easily >>> | addport - replacement for easy-import >>> | @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ portsearch - A utility for searching the >>> | fields. This option behaves differently to the other op- >>> | tions, see the EXAMPLES section >>> | >>> | - -f file Use the index file file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX >>> | + -f file Use the index file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX >> >> I don't think this was a duplicate word. It's letting you know that it >> expects to find an INDEX file named "file" (for whatever you specify). >> >>> 1.2 +1 -1 ports/Tools/scripts/README.portsearch >>> http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/Tools/scripts/README.portsearch.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 >>> | --- ports/Tools/scripts/README.portsearch 2000/08/28 11:37:23 1.1 >>> | +++ ports/Tools/scripts/README.portsearch 2011/12/27 03:32:25 1.2 >>> | @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ DESCRIPTION >>> | fields. This option behaves differently to the other op- >>> | tions, see the EXAMPLES section >>> | >>> | - -f file Use the index file file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX >>> | + -f file Use the index file instead of /usr/ports/INDEX >> >> Same here. > > Would changing that to something like "Use an alternative index file > instead of /usr/ports/INDEX" make it more clear? Or index-file file (that's what I typically do in usage messages for scripts I write). Anything to help denote the noun from what it's describing would help :). Thanks! -Garretthelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wSb_wLuHYZ6HYWzLpt79HVVAuBe7Rx8GPEdRuz-44%2B-PQ>