Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 03:23:30 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <xzplm0vzcrh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <3E4071F4.7090007@cream.org> (Andrew Boothman's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2003 02:07:48 %2B0000") References: <200302041944.h14JiSaX076743@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3E406467.8020500@cream.org> <xzpwukfzedb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3E4071F4.7090007@cream.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> writes: > I said that if -core can't describe exactly what happened then a > statement giving the jist of the problem and their reasons for their > actions would be good enough. You already got that. No less than two core team members have expressed their view on what happened and why on -chat. Not core's fault that you weren't paying attention. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplm0vzcrh.fsf>