Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 21:00:31 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, John Marino <marino@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r354249 - in head/textproc: . templates_parser templates_parser/files Message-ID: <5376604F.9090809@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20140516184419.GA63781@mouf.net> References: <201405161751.s4GHpvll092739@svn.freebsd.org> <20140516184419.GA63781@mouf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/16/2014 20:44, Steve Wills wrote: > I wonder if it would make sense to prefix the ada using ports, much like the > p5- for perl ports, rubyem- for rubygem ports, etc.? I find this makes it > easier for me to find things, tho perhaps we just need a new (meta) category? > What do you think? I don't think it's necessary. Ada ports require an Ada compiler, and right now all ports use the same compiler, lang/gcc-aux. Anybody that wants to see a list of Ada ports all they have to do is go to < http://www.freshports.org/lang/gcc-aux > and see the "required for build" list. > Also, just wondering, does the Ada stuff have a utility like cpan or gem? No, nothing like that exists. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5376604F.9090809>