Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:36:06 +0900 (JST) From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> To: shige@freebsd.org Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu, asami@freebsd.org, jdp@freebsd.org, sf@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/emacs21 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs21/files patch-configure.in patch-lib-src:Makefile.in patch-man:Makefile.in Message-ID: <20011030.023606.27055934.ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <20011030.021947.88249082.shige@FreeBSD.org> References: <20011029.142548.06934931.shige@FreeBSD.org> <20011030.014335.98951907.ume@mahoroba.org> <20011030.021947.88249082.shige@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:19:47 +0900 (JST)
>>>>> Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> said:
> shige> emacs-21.x port -> editors/emacs-devel
> Umm, I don't think that it fits for current status of Emacs21.
> emacs-21.1 is now release version.
shige> emacs-devel is an bad naming?
Yes, I think so.
shige> emacs-current is ok?
It sounds better than -devel to me. However, it means a development
branch in FreeBSD. Does someone have a good naming?
shige> Any other good method??
Thank you for explanation of the method. I have no objection against
the method. I think about just the naming.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011030.023606.27055934.ume>