Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:50:11 +0000 From: Support Team <help@mokka.ru> To: freebsd-current-freebsd-org111@ketas.si.pri.ee, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: #263083352 getting allwinner h618 soc supported? Message-ID: <CAL=07mzcG1wTj4_mEv-w0MxQrOogqqmCCVFOCBck93gJpOqXHg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <A5C10E94-FE8D-4D04-A042-EC78656AC0D4@ketas.si.pri.ee> References: <A5C10E94-FE8D-4D04-A042-EC78656AC0D4@ketas.si.pri.ee>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Мы работаем над вашим запросом. Нам понадобилось чуть больше времени, чтобы решить ваш вопрос #263083352. Еще 24 часа, и мы постараемся к вам вернуться. Приносим извинения за неудобства. Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это письмо, так как оно сформировано автоматически. Sincerely, Mokka Support Team [#ID-263083352] Saturday, January 4, 2025 7:45 AM, owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org: > is there anyone working on that? still? anymore? > > basically i have code for 13.2 and hw to test this on but i'm not > comfortable on this field > > it would be waste of already written code by someone else and interesting, > cheap, available hw that could run fbsd. the code needs cleanup, that part > i get. on functionality, i can't really comment on > > i started with uboot, but i couldn't get it built for my board, orange pi > zero 2 w. what a bummer. was referred to vendor specific fork instead by > code author > > i also tried existing fel tools in ports to get working on this, well good > luck with that too > > should i discard the whole idea and just get h5/h6? right now h3 is quite > awesome for low perf purpose but i want future proof 64bit. allwinner feels > nice vendor here somehow. all open > > what does anyone think? i'm not quite the guy who should work with this > too as it's difficult to understand. i would prefer writing userland tools > on top of kernel > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr">Мы работаем над вашим запросом. Нам понадобилось чуть больше времени, чтобы решить ваш вопрос #263083352. Еще 24 часа, и мы постараемся к вам вернуться. Приносим извинения за неудобства. <br><br>Пожалуйста, не отвечайте на это письмо, так как оно сформировано автоматически. <br>Sincerely, Mokka Support Team<div>[#ID-263083352]</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">Saturday, January 4, 2025 7:45 AM, owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"><div>is there anyone working on that? still? anymore?</div><div><br></div><div>basically i have code for 13.2 and hw to test this on but i'm not comfortable on this field</div><div><br></div><div>it would be waste of already written code by someone else and interesting, cheap, available hw that could run fbsd. the code needs cleanup, that part i get. on functionality, i can't really comment on</div><div><br></div><div>i started with uboot, but i couldn't get it built for my board, orange pi zero 2 w. what a bummer. was referred to vendor specific fork instead by code author</div><div><br></div><div>i also tried existing fel tools in ports to get working on this, well good luck with that too</div><div><br></div><div>should i discard the whole idea and just get h5/h6? right now h3 is quite awesome for low perf purpose but i want future proof 64bit. allwinner feels nice vendor here somehow. all open</div><div><br></div><div>what does anyone think? i'm not quite the guy who should work with this too as it's difficult to understand. i would prefer writing userland tools on top of kernel</div><div><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAL=07mzcG1wTj4_mEv-w0MxQrOogqqmCCVFOCBck93gJpOqXHg>
