Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 11:57:00 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, terry@lambert.org, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS in -current is _BUSTED_ Message-ID: <199605101857.LAA02377@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199605100625.PAA07996@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at May 10, 96 03:55:17 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Different bcopy optimisations. Diff -stable i386/i386/support.s against > the -current version to see what Terry's talking about. Yes. > Au contraire. So how big _is_ this filesystem? I was being told by a > rampant Linux-fanatic genetecist the other day that "of the PC unices, > only Linux could possibly manage either of the HGI database, because > it's so big." > > According to him it's around the 100GB mark; obviously you wouldn't > put this on one filesystem for performance/backup reasons, but it would > be very funny to counter his drivel... 8) One wonders how he runs Sybase, since the HGI needs that. That's why I was running Sybase on FreeBSD (back when the database was at the 2G mark). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605101857.LAA02377>