Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:08:37 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: alpha tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20020412130837.I28249@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020412130158.H28249@espresso.q9media.com>; from mike@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:01:58PM -0400 References: <200204111654.g3BGsmc9069057@beast.freebsd.org> <20020412135421.GC27751@sunbay.com> <20020412121212.E28249@espresso.q9media.com> <20020412095128.A97770@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020412130158.H28249@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > Sort of. The way it historically built was by taking advantage of the > fact that C allows multiple #define's if they are the same. My commit > changed the definition of BYTE_ORDER to _BYTE_ORDER instead of > LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN. Just a little correction. The problem is my commit changed the definition of BIG_ENDIAN from 4321 to _BIG_ENDIAN (which is defined as 4321). Similarly for LITTLE_ENDIAN. The BYTE_ORDER macro isn't touched in defs.h. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020412130837.I28249>