Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:31:48 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Chris <rip@overflow.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: [fbsd] Integrating ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD Message-ID: <20060609233148.GA88285@gothmog.pc> In-Reply-To: <4489DCAE.3070005@overflow.no> References: <20060526153422.GB25953@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060609095751.GI1273@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <4489DCAE.3070005@overflow.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-06-09 16:40, Chris <rip@overflow.no> wrote: >Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:34:22PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> first sorry for cross-posting but I thought this patch might interest >>> -CURRENT users as well as people concerned by security. >>> >>> I wrote a patch that integrates ProPolice/SSP into FreeBSD, one step >>> further than it has been realized so far. >>> >>> It is available here : >>> http://tataz.chchile.org/~tataz/FreeBSD/SSP/ >> >> Hi list, >> I haven't got much feedback so far. I would be glad if any people >> who have been using this patch told be if they have been faced with >> some problems. >[...] > I'm using it successfuly with the stackp-gap and the random mmap > on 6.1-RELEASE. No problems at all really :) Except that i want a nob > for gcc to use the protection by default. We discussed this in another > email. You can always use `/etc/make.conf' to set it globally, right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609233148.GA88285>