Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:22:21 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: brooks@one-eyed-alien.net Cc: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org, gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: Beta2: Nice job! Message-ID: <20050822.212221.130618636.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050822181740.GD22948@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <17161.51084.456346.976929@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20050822181740.GD22948@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050822181740.GD22948@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> writes:
: On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:39:40AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
: > - Maybe /etc/pccard_ether should not depend on $removable_interfaces.
: > After all, it does ignore interfaces which are up. Or maybe I'm just
: > bitter because it took me 15 minutes to figure out why the wireless
: > card was not getting setup on resume... ;)
:
: I'm leaning more an more in this direction. I just need some time to
: work on it a bit more.
Yes. This was definitely an unwise choice. It certainly broke years
of tradition, if nothing else :-). It tripped me up for a period of
time as well, and when I build/install my 'virgin' tree it still trips
me up for a few seconds when I see the behavior that I've dyked out
return. Of course my hammer is big (completely remove
removable_interfaces and replace it with nothing).
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050822.212221.130618636.imp>