Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:24:02 +0100 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS2 and Journaling in 9.1-RC3 Message-ID: <CAFYkXjmmCXzvx=Vn4HUYt_9tpomE2Z8jLHrSqOqpMjU5ma-sjA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50C206B7.5040800@quip.cz> References: <CAFYkXj=iv_MWhLC5YTfXGZA7RdLt3iEEjT_sDfPETCDf%2BK-KaQ@mail.gmail.com> <k9srm6$56d$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAFYkXjkH-Bj5ee7Y1dgEKXQQpdGwVUe7J=WEiAmJsO7T_uHyqw@mail.gmail.com> <50C206B7.5040800@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > In short - if you choose Gjournal with data and journal on the same disk, > you will have about half write speed. Okay, minus for GJournal in that case, but it is very interesting solution, as most of the stuff in FreeBSD :-) > If you choose SU+J, you will not be able to use UFS snapshot feature at this > time (there is some bug and snapshots on SU+J is disabled) Not really need snapshots :-) > Other than that - SU+J is easier to Enable / Disable on existing partition > but is not well testet - it is younger technology than Gjournal. Okay I can test it :-) I just hope it wont eat my precious data :-) I will take UFS2-SU+J then :-) Thanks Miroslav! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjmmCXzvx=Vn4HUYt_9tpomE2Z8jLHrSqOqpMjU5ma-sjA>