Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:36:38 -0700 From: Michael Haro <mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us> To: Johan Dalstrom <jd@c64.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build of /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12 Message-ID: <19990512153638.A75030@area51.fremont.ca.us> In-Reply-To: <19990513003347.A93169@fx.c64.org>; from Johan Dalstrom on Thu, May 13, 1999 at 12:33:47AM %2B0200 References: <19990512234917.A92549@fx.c64.org> <19990513003347.A93169@fx.c64.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bsd.port.mk was update because perl5 was updated in -current. perl5 in 3.1-stable/beta/whatever_you_call_it is still at 5.00502 AFAIK. As for the perl5 port, I don't know. Michael On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Johan Dalstrom wrote: > Okay, > > PERL_VERSION= 5.00503 > > but why isn't the ports-tree uppgraded? > Is there any special reason for upgrading bsd.port.mk > and not /usr/ports/lang/perl5? > > And as I see it, it would be better to install via ports > than installing by hand, because of the package-checking.. > Am I wrong? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990512153638.A75030>