Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:19:10 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.subr Message-ID: <4393F7FE.7020302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051205081123.GA80228@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200512050704.jB574FeY098280@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051205081123.GA80228@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:04:15AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote:
>> dougb 2005-12-05 07:04:15 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> etc rc.subr
>> Log:
>> Change how *.sh scripts are handled. If the script is in /etc/rc.d,
>> source it into the shell. If not, handle it in a subshell the same
>> way that "real" rc.d-style scripts are handled. This will dramatically
>> ease the "process local scripts in the base rcorder" transition.
>
> How it will impact ports changes needed? I.e. should apache13 transition
> be backed out?
Answering the last question first, the change already done in apache13
effectively becomes a noop at this point. I'm honestly not sure what's going
to happen with this in the long term, so feel free to back it out if you want.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4393F7FE.7020302>