Date: Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 +0100 From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/latex/scripts configure ports/print/latex Makefile Message-ID: <9702260208.AA27039@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> In-Reply-To: <199702250924.BAA05797@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> (asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> Satoshi Asami writes: > * Modified: print/latex Makefile > * Added: print/latex/scripts configure > * Log: > * Adapt to the new version of fetch. > Perhaps related to the tex failure, but this one doesn't package > either. No this is my fault :-(. I should always install/test my ports in empty directories.... > Satoshi > P.S. It seems like print/{tex,latex} is giving us a very high problem > rate, do we really need them now that teTeX is functional > (usually) and contains a full *TeX distribution? I don't know if many people use the tex/latex port. Of course, if nobody use it, we can remove it. On the other hand there is a big difference in size (because tetex has a lot of stuff). Jean-Marc _____________________________________________________________________________ Jean-Marc Zucconi Observatoire de Besancon F 25010 Besancon cedex PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr =============================================================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9702260208.AA27039>