Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:28:01 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Gary Corcoran <garycor@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD or other BSD for no-MMU ARM processor ? Message-ID: <20040615062800.GD987@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <40CDFD39.3090309@comcast.net> References: <40CDFD39.3090309@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:32:09PM -0400, Gary Corcoran wrote: >=20 > Does anyone know if there is a port of FreeBSD, or any of the > other BSDs (e.g. NetBSD) for that matter, which will run on an > ARM processor which does NOT have an MMU (Memory Management Unit)? Your best bet would be http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/ Unfortunately, I'm not too familiar with the ARM line of processors, so it's not really obvious to me if NetBSD supports architecturs without MMU's. ISTR that there was a decision very early down the line for FreeBSD to *not* support anything that didn't have an MMU.. or was that even earlier, and does it also hold true for other BSD's? G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wou= ldn't be false. --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAzpbw7Ri2jRYZRVMRAq4eAJ9nZYk+GysYYD9m3udjlnlp1ateHwCgrqpg h3nmHxyL9SvyOTlGgbuttk4= =KMxg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040615062800.GD987>