Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 21:41:07 -0700 (PDT) From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, dillon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc make.conf Message-ID: <199808270441.VAA21637@burka.rdy.com> In-Reply-To: <199808270422.OAA22752@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from Bruce Evans at "Aug 27, 1998 2:22:14 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes:
> > Modified files:
> > etc make.conf
> > Log:
> > Reviewed by: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
> >
> > Give make.conf a make.conf.local capability similar to rc.conf's
> > rc.conf.local capability. Eases large-site administration.
>
> Bogus. make.conf is already entirely local. It is the local extension
> of <sys.mk>.
It actually depends. If we consider /etc/{daily,weekly,monthly,rc.conf}
etc etc etc being local, then what's the point of having their .local
extensions?
My point of view that even though that it might sound bogus - it is still
convenient.
>
> Bruce
>
-- dima
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808270441.VAA21637>