Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:22:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, simon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [simon@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/ssl d1_both.c ?dtls1.h ssl.h ssl_err.c] Message-ID: <200710231622.l9NGMghL042088@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <20071018223724.GA987@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet Uhm, are you sure? In the past, whenever a new RELENG branch was created, it was implicitly the next -stable branch, because -current moved on to the next version number. Did that policy change? If it did change, I'm curious to know what the version 7 branch is called right now (6 being -stable and 8 being -current)? I assume we do not have two -current branches at the same time, do we? Best regards Oliver PS: I do agree that the DTLS security fix doesn't need a FreeBSD Security Advisory, for the reason that it doesn't seem to affect any _released_ FreeBSD version. -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710231622.l9NGMghL042088>