Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:01:27 +0200 From: Michael Schuster <michaelsprivate@gmail.com> To: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Used Disk Space Message-ID: <CADqw_gL=DZ5pmuRMqyBxHqXpvkp7OAKSaS7AJW6PCKsEgtgTFg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9D4BE892-FA1A-4B5D-B144-2D51F7D822B7@sermon-archive.info> References: <9D4BE892-FA1A-4B5D-B144-2D51F7D822B7@sermon-archive.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:09 PM Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote: > > I have two systems: one is amd64 and the other arm64. The amd64 is 13.0,= the arm64 is 13.1 RC1. The disk utilization between the machines is quite= different. For example, /usr/lib only has 2 extra files in the arm64. Th= ey add up to less than 100 M. du -sh on amd64 shows 502M for /usr/lib, and= du -sh on arm64 shows 2.1G. Walking through the entries on both systems, = most are identical. When there are differences, they are around 2M at most= . Often they are around 10K. The arm64 is using almost twice the space of= the amd64 if you believe du. However, the sum of the individual allocatio= ns on each system are less than 100M different. What is going on? I haven't done much active FS work for a while, so I'll just hazard a guess: ZFS vs UFS? perhaps FS allocation units are different between the two systems? HTH Michael > > > -- Doug > > --=20 Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADqw_gL=DZ5pmuRMqyBxHqXpvkp7OAKSaS7AJW6PCKsEgtgTFg>