Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 22:09:44 +0100 From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org> To: mika ruohotie <bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net> Cc: macgyver@db-net.com (Wilson MacGyver), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p166 vs. p166mmx Message-ID: <199704022109.WAA14871@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Apr 1997 15:19:20 %2B0300." <199704021219.PAA03426@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > make -k world 7595.59s user 1843.94s system 87% cpu 3:00:48.28 total
> > > make -k world 5982.25s user 1636.02s system 87% cpu 2:24:21.88 total
> > Wouldn't this be because of the larger L1 cache? If memory
> > serves, L1 cache was increased from 16K to 32K...
>
> yes, but still i didnt expect the difference to be about 21% for user and 17%
> for total time...
>
>
> mickey
Hmm, I don't know. I heard reports that a PP150 w/ 512k cache was
almost as good as a PP200 2/ 256k.
--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org>
<http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704022109.WAA14871>