Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:24:47 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers please! Message-ID: <19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:01:52 %2B0200." <17979.937771312@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > If you have a PIIX4 based SMP system and run current, could you > please try out this patch: > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/piix/ > > I'm very interested in hearing if there are any measurable difference > apart from clock granularity being 3 times better. There is a problem with it as it tries to claim the same device as claimed by pcisupport.c and intpm.c.. pcisupport.c is where some folks have been hanging Tor Egge's RTC SMI trap patch from.. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990920012447.C1C1B1CC5>