Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:16:46 +0000 From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Chris Gilbert <Chris@lainos.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 ) Message-ID: <20051221131646.GA98466@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <200512212306.36473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <43A266E5.3080103@samsco.org> <200512180107.03841.Chris@lainos.org> <20051221100944.GA54932@uk.tiscali.com> <200512212306.36473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:06:35PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > This *is* an annoying problem, but the solutions are far from simple.. Agreed - and I was mainly agreeing to the suggestion to take this off-list. Perhaps each of the possible solutions could be stuck onto a wiki whiteboard so that they could be annotated with their strengths and weaknesses. Regards, Brian.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051221131646.GA98466>