Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:09:05 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port management tools (was: Status of synth) Message-ID: <20170216150905.4c76175a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <6115a896-7e90-ce22-6355-ed1bb7e02ada@m5p.com> References: <201702160844.v1G8iiRP000405@gw.catspoiler.org> <6115a896-7e90-ce22-6355-ed1bb7e02ada@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:19:24 -0500 George Mitchell wrote: > > Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going through all the > > config screens. Back when I used portupgrade, I found that it was > > too easy to accidentally set some option for a port to a > > non-default value where it would persist forever. [...] > > This is in a nutshell why one group of FreeBSD users love portmaster > so much. I switched from portugrade to portmaster a long time ago > for this very reason. Do you mean because you didn't want to type "-c"?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170216150905.4c76175a>