Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:33:27 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: des@ofug.org, nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org, peter@wemm.org, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, mdodd@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The cbus driver for pc98 Message-ID: <20030217.103327.42775167.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <63119.1045502530@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20030217.101837.40575213.imp@bsdimp.com> <63119.1045502530@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <63119.1045502530@critter.freebsd.dk>
phk@phk.freebsd.dk writes:
: In message <20030217.101837.40575213.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
: >In message: <xzpbs1bclbz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
: >: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> writes:
: >: > I have had some questions like "Does PC98 have ISA bus?" or "Why PC98
: >: > uses ISA driver?". To clear these questions and problems, I think
: >: > that adding separated cbus driver is better way.
: >:
: >: So you're duplicating a large amount of existing, working code just so
: >: you can avoid answering questions from confused users? Or are there
: >: any actual technical advantages to having a separate cbus driver?
: >
: >That's a little too harsh.
:
: I actually think that it would be an improvement over the current
: copy-the-isa-file-and-add-#ifdef-PC98-making-diffs-hard-to-read
: approach.
Have you looked at the actual patch? That's exactly what this patch
does more of.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030217.103327.42775167.imp>