Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 12:49:05 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r265498 - stable/10/sys/dev/iscsi Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405071247490.20912@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <201405070638.s476cK2J092699@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201405070638.s476cK2J092699@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote: > Author: trasz > Date: Wed May 7 06:38:19 2014 > New Revision: 265498 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/265498 > > Log: > MFC r264025: > > Get rid of the "autoscaling", instead just set socket buffer sizes > in the usual way. The only thing the old code did was making things > less predictable. Does this mean that the autoscaling algorithm needs refining? The problem with disabling autoscaling is that the code may, in the future, fail to benefit from further global refinements, as old code that hard-coded sizes now fails to do -- and that if we don't refine the autoscaling model, other applications may fail to benefit. Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1405071247490.20912>