Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:17:20 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AW: Question Update Java Security Updates Message-ID: <20110310161721.59652106566B@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20110310120028.6013310656B0@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Agreed, we should probably switch the default JDK to openjdk6. >> >> Really, even considering the large number of security issues openjdk has >> had and is expected to continue to having for the foreseeable future? >> >> Sounds like a recipe for pain among FreeBSD default JDK users or at least >> those whose primary criteria for a JDK are compatibility and security. > > Is having very old "official" JDK any better? Old or new is not a criteria many sysadmins value relative to the pain of upgrading. The time and effort to upgrade applications and servers every few years vs several times a year can make or break the choice of an OS, and used to be FreeBSD's strong suite vis-a-vis Linux. > I don't think we get many (any?) security updates for them lately. The reason for that is that they haven't been necessary. This cannot be said for openjdk, not yet at least. Roger Marquis
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110310161721.59652106566B>